Pew Forum Issues New Study On Religious Restrictions Around the World

Authors

noreply@blogger.com (Howard Friedman)

Pew Forum on Religion & Public Lifeyestereday released a 72-page report titled Global Restriction on Religion. It finds that 64 nations have high or very high restrictions on religion, affecting nearly 70% of the world's population. The report tracks both official government policies and hostile acts from private individuals, organizations and social groups. Actions by local officials were considered restrictions even if they were contrary to national policy, as long ... (Read Full Article)

Bookmark or Share this article

Related Articles
- Hindus Angered by Christian Evangelism
- also categorized in Proselytization
- Senate Resolution Condemns Mumbai Attack, Opposes Religious Extremism
- also written by noreply@blogger.com (Howard Friedman)
- NY Community Board Approves Plans For Mosque Near Ground Zero
- also written by noreply@blogger.com (Howard Friedman)
- Bajrang Dal denies hand in church attacks
- also categorized in Proselytization
- Samoan Council of Churches Wants To Limit Entry of New Religions To Country
- also written by noreply@blogger.com (Howard Friedman)
- Malaysian Woman Challenges Ban On Non-Muslim Lawyers Practicing In Syariah Court
- also written by noreply@blogger.com (Howard Friedman)
- Mangalore residents blame forcible conversions
- also categorized in Proselytization
- Conversion Of Dalits
- also categorized in Proselytization
- Catholic, Hindu leaders join for peace in Karnataka
- also categorized in Proselytization
- Retired judge to probe Karnataka Church attacks
- also categorized in Proselytization

Recent Comments

Reply Permalink

On 1/1/10 reformuscirf said:

"Pew Forum's "SHI" (i.e. Social Hostility Index which captures social hostility towards minority faith) construction is faulty. It solely focuses on negative incidents and ignores positive incidents. It is based on row number of negative incidents instead of %age of negative vs. positive incidents. Thus, It completely ignores positive developments and ends up portraying exception as rule.

More-over, PEW Study fails to distinguish between Provoked vs. non-provoked negative incident. Hate-crime vs. non-hate-crime (e.g. tribal land dispute in orissa state of india).

For instance, PEW ignores following facts and declares india as socially hostile towards minority:-
Fact #1: Socially hostile people will never elect minority person as Prime-Minister or Chief-Minister. However, India's Prime-Minister, Vice-President, Supreme leader of ruling party and several chief ministers belong to minority community.

Fact #2: Number of positive incidents is perhaps 1000000% higher than no. of negative incidents. For example, Large scale hindu participation in christian and islamic festivals and prayers.

Fact #3: Most negative incidents are provoked due to non-hatred causes like tit-for-tat,land-dispute and govt. benefits etc. Provoked negative incidents are bad and must be strongly condemned. However, It is not as useful as unprovoked hate-crime is measuring social hostility.

In similar manner, PEW's Government Restriction Index is built on negative. It ignores positive government accommodations. For example, India is perhaps the only country which has 1 public holiday assigned for each and every religion (list: zorahstrains, jain, sikh, buddhist, christain, islam, hindu).

http://www.uscirf.blogspot.com"