Close Message
None
  1. Why We Keep Rocking the Boat. Last week, a federal judge blocked South Carolina plans to issue a Christian themed license plate that was to feature the words, "I Believe," floating above a gold cross and stained-glass church window. The Hindu American Foundation (HAF) filed suit against the state of South Carolina in June along with an interfaith coalition of co-plaintiffs including local Christian and Jewish leaders as well as the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, a religious liberty watch dog group based in Washington DC, represented the coalition.

    In the back and forth emails between co-plaintiffs following the favorable ruling, celebratory comments such as "historic moment," "what a great day," and "you've done us proud" came not from members of the Foundation or the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee, although we too were elated, but those Christian leaders who courageously chose to stand against majoritarianism and many of their kin, in favor of our Founding Father's mandate for the separation of church and state.  This latest interfaith endeavor in legal advocacy and the jubilation felt by us all, regardless of our religious affiliations, got me thinking about the Foundation's earliest efforts in the arena of religious liberty and the knee-jerk criticism of being "anti-Christian" we first faced by some in the community.


    Rewind three years.  HAF's first foray into religious liberty advocacy was our seminal filing of an amicus curiae (friend of court) brief in Van Orden v. Perry (2005).  Van Orden questioned the legality of a public display of the Ten Commandments on state capitol grounds.  You could almost hear the fabric of our community tear between 1st and 2nd generation Hindu Americans at the thought of asking the Supreme Court to order removal of the display: the 2nd, those raised in the U.S., applauding our efforts with words of support and the 1st admonishing us for "rocking the boat," accusing us of being"anti-Christian" and advising that we should sit quiet because we were "guests in this country."


    As we said then and we continue to say today, we are not opposing any religion.  In fact, we have the utmost respect for Judaism, Christianity and all religions, for that matter, as is reflected in the interfaith work of the Foundation.  However, HAF's stance in South Carolina and other church/state cases shares the views of our Founding Fathers and countless religious and irreligious Americans, including our Christian and Jewish co-plaintiffs, who believe that our duty as Americans is to insist on a separation of church and state as guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution.  Indeed, participating in the national dialogue on religious liberty is a clear signal of our own pride, confidence and sense of ownership in this country and in the U.S. Constitution.  Hindu Americans came to this country to realize the American dream, and have done so thanks to the guarantees of freedom and those Americans who have been willing to stand up for them when threatened. 


    A democracy is built upon the assumption of majority rule.  But there are inherent freedoms and rights of equality built in to our laws to curb  the potential of majoritarian tyranny and to ensure that the minority still has its voice heard.  But those freedoms have, throughout our nation's history, been threatened or taken away and it took boat rocking to get them back.  So rock the boat…I know we will.

    Bookmark or Share this article


    Related Articles

Recent Comments


Reply Permalink
On 3/13/09 Mayank Patel said:
"HAFs mission frequently requires "Rocking the Boat" (i.e. Challenging Status Quo). I am glad we have a leadership which is not afraid of Rocking the boat.

There are two types of Rocking:-
1) Exclusive-Rocking where HAF is the only party or main party doing the rocking.
Pro's: Server HAF's mission. More-over,In HAFs absence this rocking may not get done at all.
Con's: None
2) Shared-Rocking where HAF is one of the many parties doing the rocking.
Pro's: Serve HAF's mission. Build alliance with like-minded organizations.
Con's: Might take away focus from Exclusive-Rocking."
Reply Permalink
On 7/22/09 Swami Param said:
"If one is going to "rock the boat," one needs to look one's beliefs. In looking over HAF's "Hinduism Basics," it is clear that more clarification is necessary. We Hindus should be willing to dialogue with each other (something HAF does not always do)in an effort to truly "promote understanding" among Hindus.

Like many Hindus, HAF misuses the Christian term "God." Thoughtful Hindus do not believe in God any more than a Christian would pray to Siva, Vishnu and (especially)the many forms of the MahaDevi. In praising tolerance, what does this mean--to tolerate misperceptions of Hinduism? In promoting pluralism, the Hindu is actually denying the wisdom of Tat Twam Asi. To use English terms, Hinduism is monistic (the opposite of pluralism) polymorphism and certainly not monotheism or any Theism/Theos/God.

In (falsely) claiming "Hinduism is the world's oldest living religion," what is the point if Hindus are going to merely capitulate to the lesser monotheism? It is because of the inability of many Hindus to stand for their Dharma that we have all the misperceptions and outright theft of Hindu Dharma. To understand this theft, simply ask many "What is Yoga; Mantra; Guru and Swastika," for example. In answer to these questions, you may very well get: an exercise business; any repetitive saying; an expert in anything and an evil symbol, respectively.

In Dharma,
Swami Param
Dharma Yoga Asrham (Classical Yoga Hindu Academy)"
Reply Permalink
On 7/30/09 Swami Param said:
"Speaking of majoritarian tryanny, those at HAF (and many other Hindus) are unwilling to even discuss some of their views on what is Hinduism--can we say closed-minded?

Swami Param
Dharma Yoga Ashram (Classical Yoga Hindu Academy)
"

Login to comment.

 
HomeAll ArticlesProfilesQuotesComments Login Register Powered by HiveFire